On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:12 AM, George Dunlap
wrote:
> On 08/02/17 17:29, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > At 17:22 + on 08 Feb (1486574546), George Dunlap wrote:
> >> Commit 71bb7304e7a7a35ea6df4b0cedebc35028e4c159 added flushing of
> >> nested p2m tables whenever the host
On 08/02/17 17:29, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 17:22 + on 08 Feb (1486574546), George Dunlap wrote:
>> Commit 71bb7304e7a7a35ea6df4b0cedebc35028e4c159 added flushing of
>> nested p2m tables whenever the host p2m table changed. Unfortunately
>> in the process, it added a filter to p2m_flush_table()
At 17:22 + on 08 Feb (1486574546), George Dunlap wrote:
> Commit 71bb7304e7a7a35ea6df4b0cedebc35028e4c159 added flushing of
> nested p2m tables whenever the host p2m table changed. Unfortunately
> in the process, it added a filter to p2m_flush_table() function so
> that the p2m would only be
Commit 71bb7304e7a7a35ea6df4b0cedebc35028e4c159 added flushing of
nested p2m tables whenever the host p2m table changed. Unfortunately
in the process, it added a filter to p2m_flush_table() function so
that the p2m would only be flushed if it was being used as a nested
p2m. This meant that the