>>> On 15.02.16 at 18:17, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 15.02.16 at 17:55, wrote:
>> > All paths that end up using this dr7 value in vm_event have v==current,
>> so
>> > right now there is no caller to this function using dr7 where v!=current.
>> > Futur
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.02.16 at 17:55, wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> >> >>> On 15.02.16 at 17:27, wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Jan Beulich
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >>> On 12.02.16 at 13:57, wrot
>>> On 15.02.16 at 17:55, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> >>> On 15.02.16 at 17:27, wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >
>> >> >>> On 12.02.16 at 13:57, wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 12, 2016 02:12, "Jan Beulich" wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.02.16 at 17:27, wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> >> >>> On 12.02.16 at 13:57, wrote:
> >> > On Feb 12, 2016 02:12, "Jan Beulich" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >>> On 12.02.16 at 01:22, wrote:
> >> >>
>>> On 15.02.16 at 17:27, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> >>> On 12.02.16 at 13:57, wrote:
>> > On Feb 12, 2016 02:12, "Jan Beulich" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>> On 12.02.16 at 01:22, wrote:
>> >> > Sending the dr7 register during vm_events is useful for various
>>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.02.16 at 13:57, wrote:
> > On Feb 12, 2016 02:12, "Jan Beulich" wrote:
> >>
> >> >>> On 12.02.16 at 01:22, wrote:
> >> > Sending the dr7 register during vm_events is useful for various
> > applications,
> >> > but the current way
>>> On 12.02.16 at 13:57, wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2016 02:12, "Jan Beulich" wrote:
>>
>> >>> On 12.02.16 at 01:22, wrote:
>> > Sending the dr7 register during vm_events is useful for various
> applications,
>> > but the current way the register value is gathered is incorrent. In this
>> > patch
>> >
On Feb 12, 2016 02:12, "Jan Beulich" wrote:
>
> >>> On 12.02.16 at 01:22, wrote:
> > Sending the dr7 register during vm_events is useful for various
applications,
> > but the current way the register value is gathered is incorrent. In this
> > patch
> > we extend vmx_vmcs_save so that we get the
>>> On 12.02.16 at 01:22, wrote:
> Sending the dr7 register during vm_events is useful for various applications,
> but the current way the register value is gathered is incorrent. In this
> patch
> we extend vmx_vmcs_save so that we get the correct value.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
Iirc A
On 02/12/2016 02:22 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Sending the dr7 register during vm_events is useful for various applications,
> but the current way the register value is gathered is incorrent. In this patch
> we extend vmx_vmcs_save so that we get the correct value.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Coope
Sending the dr7 register during vm_events is useful for various applications,
but the current way the register value is gathered is incorrent. In this patch
we extend vmx_vmcs_save so that we get the correct value.
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel
Cc: Jun Nakajima
Cc:
11 matches
Mail list logo