On Wednesday 11 November 2015 11:51:26 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> > > I'm sort of objecting to a different issue, where the
> > > __current_kernel_time() implementation probably shouldn't be grabbing
> > > th
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> > I'm sort of objecting to a different issue, where the
> > __current_kernel_time() implementation probably shouldn't be grabbing
> > the tk_core.timekeeper directly, and instead should take a passed
> > pointer
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> I'm sort of objecting to a different issue, where the
> __current_kernel_time() implementation probably shouldn't be grabbing
> the tk_core.timekeeper directly, and instead should take a passed
> pointer to a timekeeper. The vdso/pv_clock usage should have
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Stefano Stabellini
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:49 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> >> > __current_
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:49 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> > __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:49 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> > __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
>> > xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/curre
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:49 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
> > xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time.
> >
>
> Actually it doesn't mirror __current_ke
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:57:49AM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
> > xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time.
>
> It always helps if you include a reaso
On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:49 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
> xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time.
>
Actually it doesn't mirror __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time
> diff --git a/include/
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:57:49AM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
> xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time.
It always helps if you include a reason why you want a patch.
__current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
CC: a...@arndb.de
CC: john.stu...@linaro.org
CC: t...@linutronix.de
CC: mi...@kernel.org
CC: pet...@infradead.org
---
include/l
11 matches
Mail list logo
