On 2017/3/31 5:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Wei,
>>
>> On 30/03/17 10:13, Wei Chen wrote:
>>> We have provided an option to administrator to determine how to
>>> handle the SErrors. In order to skip the check of pending SError,
>>> in conventional w
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> On 30/03/17 10:13, Wei Chen wrote:
> > We have provided an option to administrator to determine how to
> > handle the SErrors. In order to skip the check of pending SError,
> > in conventional way, we have to read the option every time before
Hi Wei,
On 30/03/17 10:13, Wei Chen wrote:
We have provided an option to administrator to determine how to
handle the SErrors. In order to skip the check of pending SError,
in conventional way, we have to read the option every time before
we try to check the pending SError. This will add overhea
We have provided an option to administrator to determine how to
handle the SErrors. In order to skip the check of pending SError,
in conventional way, we have to read the option every time before
we try to check the pending SError. This will add overhead to check
the option at every trap.
The ARM3
