>>> On 29.09.16 at 23:12, wrote:
> On 28/09/16 09:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -2216,7 +2217,7 @@ x86_decode(
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -if ( override_seg != -1 && ea.type == OP_MEM )
>> +if ( override_seg != x86_seg_none )
>
> I don't see why the "ea.type == OP_MEM" should be dropp
On 28/09/16 09:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Especially for x86_insn_operand_ea() to return dependable segment
> information even when the caller didn't consider applicability, we
> shouldn't have ea.type start out as OP_MEM. Make it OP_NONE instead,
> and set it to OP_MEM when we actually encounter mem
Especially for x86_insn_operand_ea() to return dependable segment
information even when the caller didn't consider applicability, we
shouldn't have ea.type start out as OP_MEM. Make it OP_NONE instead,
and set it to OP_MEM when we actually encounter memory like operands.
This requires to eliminate
