On 04/19/2017 08:37 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.04.17 at 14:13, wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:20:50AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.04.17 at 12:56, wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:49:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.04.17 at
>>> On 19.04.17 at 14:13, wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:20:50AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 19.04.17 at 12:56, wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:49:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 17.04.17 at 21:09,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:20:50AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.04.17 at 12:56, wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:49:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 17.04.17 at 21:09, wrote:
> >> > The spinlock in kexec_swap_images() was
On 19/04/17 12:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.04.17 at 12:56, wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:49:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.04.17 at 21:09, wrote:
The spinlock in kexec_swap_images() was removed as
this
>>> On 19.04.17 at 12:56, wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:49:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 17.04.17 at 21:09, wrote:
>> > The spinlock in kexec_swap_images() was removed as
>> > this function is only reachable on the kexec
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:49:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.04.17 at 21:09, wrote:
> > The spinlock in kexec_swap_images() was removed as
> > this function is only reachable on the kexec hypercall, which is
> > now protected at the top-level in
>>> On 17.04.17 at 21:09, wrote:
> The spinlock in kexec_swap_images() was removed as
> this function is only reachable on the kexec hypercall, which is
> now protected at the top-level in do_kexec_op_internal(),
> thus the local spinlock is no longer necessary.
But
The spinlock in kexec_swap_images() was removed as
this function is only reachable on the kexec hypercall, which is
now protected at the top-level in do_kexec_op_internal(),
thus the local spinlock is no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder
Reviewed-by: