On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 09:53 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 09:44 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:53:30PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > Yes. I had to remove this number since checkpatch complained that I
> > > needed to quote the whole patch tile
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 09:44 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:53:30PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > Yes. I had to remove this number since checkpatch complained that I
> > needed to quote the whole patch tile again. I will ignore this
> > checkpatch error and add this
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:53:30PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> Yes. I had to remove this number since checkpatch complained that I needed
> to quote the whole patch tile again. I will ignore this checkpatch error
> and add this commit number here.
Actually, checkpatch is right. We do quote the
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 18:00 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:46:56PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > A Xorg failure on qemu32 was reported as a regression caused
> > by 'commit 9cd25aac1f44 ("x86/mm/pat: Emulate PAT when it is
> > disabled")'. [1] This patch fixes the
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:46:56PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> A Xorg failure on qemu32 was reported as a regression caused
> by 'commit 9cd25aac1f44 ("x86/mm/pat: Emulate PAT when it is
> disabled")'. [1] This patch fixes the regression.
I hope so.
> Negative effects of this regression were two
A Xorg failure on qemu32 was reported as a regression caused
by 'commit 9cd25aac1f44 ("x86/mm/pat: Emulate PAT when it is
disabled")'. [1] This patch fixes the regression.
Negative effects of this regression were two failures in Xorg
on qemu32 env, which were triggered by the fact that its
