On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 18:01 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] x86/mtrr: Fix PAT init handling when MTRR MSR is
> disabled
>
> s/ MSR//
Will do.
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > get_mtrr_state() calls pat_init() on BSP even if MTRR is disable
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] x86/mtrr: Fix PAT init handling when MTRR MSR is
disabled
s/ MSR//
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> get_mtrr_state() calls pat_init() on BSP even if MTRR is disabled
> by its MSR.
s/by its MSR//
> This causes pat_init() to be called on BSP o
get_mtrr_state() calls pat_init() on BSP even if MTRR is disabled
by its MSR. This causes pat_init() to be called on BSP only since
APs do not call pat_init() when MTRR is disabled. This inconsistency
between BSP and APs leads undefined behavior.
Move BSP's PAT init code from get_mtrr_state() to
