On 16/06/15 14:26, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Yang Hongyang writes ("[PATCH v2 6/6] libxl/save: Refactor
> libxl__domain_suspend_state"):
>> Currently struct libxl__domain_suspend_state contains 2 type of states,
>> one is save state, another is suspend state. This patch separate it out.
>> The motivati
Yang Hongyang writes ("[PATCH v2 6/6] libxl/save: Refactor
libxl__domain_suspend_state"):
> Currently struct libxl__domain_suspend_state contains 2 type of states,
> one is save state, another is suspend state. This patch separate it out.
> The motivation of this is that COLO will need to do suspe
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 16:01 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote:
> Currently struct libxl__domain_suspend_state contains 2 type of states,
> one is save state, another is suspend state. This patch separate it out.
"This patch separates those two out".
> The motivation of this is that COLO will need to do
Currently struct libxl__domain_suspend_state contains 2 type of states,
one is save state, another is suspend state. This patch separate it out.
The motivation of this is that COLO will need to do suspend/resume
continuesly, we need a more common suspend state.
After this change, dss stands for li