Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] libxl/save: Refactor libxl__domain_suspend_state

2015-06-16 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 16/06/15 14:26, Ian Jackson wrote: > Yang Hongyang writes ("[PATCH v2 6/6] libxl/save: Refactor > libxl__domain_suspend_state"): >> Currently struct libxl__domain_suspend_state contains 2 type of states, >> one is save state, another is suspend state. This patch separate it out. >> The motivati

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] libxl/save: Refactor libxl__domain_suspend_state

2015-06-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Yang Hongyang writes ("[PATCH v2 6/6] libxl/save: Refactor libxl__domain_suspend_state"): > Currently struct libxl__domain_suspend_state contains 2 type of states, > one is save state, another is suspend state. This patch separate it out. > The motivation of this is that COLO will need to do suspe

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] libxl/save: Refactor libxl__domain_suspend_state

2015-06-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 16:01 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote: > Currently struct libxl__domain_suspend_state contains 2 type of states, > one is save state, another is suspend state. This patch separate it out. "This patch separates those two out". > The motivation of this is that COLO will need to do

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] libxl/save: Refactor libxl__domain_suspend_state

2015-06-03 Thread Yang Hongyang
Currently struct libxl__domain_suspend_state contains 2 type of states, one is save state, another is suspend state. This patch separate it out. The motivation of this is that COLO will need to do suspend/resume continuesly, we need a more common suspend state. After this change, dss stands for li