>>> On 21.06.16 at 08:19, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:51 PM
>>
>> As has been explained previously[1], SMAP (and with less relevance
>> also SMEP) is not compatible with 32-bit PV guests which aren't
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:51 PM
> To: xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Wu, Feng
> ; Keir Fraser
> Subject: [PATCH v3
On 13/05/16 18:02, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:50:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> As has been explained previously[1], SMAP (and with less relevance
>> also SMEP) is not compatible with 32-bit PV guests which aren't
>> aware/prepared to be run with that feature enabled. Andrew's
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:50:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> As has been explained previously[1], SMAP (and with less relevance
> also SMEP) is not compatible with 32-bit PV guests which aren't
> aware/prepared to be run with that feature enabled. Andrew's
> original approach either sacrificed
As has been explained previously[1], SMAP (and with less relevance
also SMEP) is not compatible with 32-bit PV guests which aren't
aware/prepared to be run with that feature enabled. Andrew's
original approach either sacrificed architectural correctness for
making 32-bit guests work again, or