On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:31:20PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/09/16 16:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > On 11.09.16 at 22:35, wrote:
> > > x86 implements all of them by default - and we just
> > > add two extra HAS_ variables to be declared in autoconf.h.
> > >
> > > ARM 64 only
Hi,
On 12/09/16 16:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.09.16 at 22:35, wrote:
x86 implements all of them by default - and we just
add two extra HAS_ variables to be declared in autoconf.h.
ARM 64 only has alternative while ARM 32 has none of them.
The ARM64 is going to be a bit funny as there is an
>>> On 11.09.16 at 22:35, wrote:
> x86 implements all of them by default - and we just
> add two extra HAS_ variables to be declared in autoconf.h.
>
> ARM 64 only has alternative while ARM 32 has none of them.
> The ARM64 is going to be a bit funny as there is an
> ALTERNATIVE already and we end
x86 implements all of them by default - and we just
add two extra HAS_ variables to be declared in autoconf.h.
ARM 64 only has alternative while ARM 32 has none of them.
The ARM64 is going to be a bit funny as there is an
ALTERNATIVE already and we end up selecting the HAS_ALTERNATIVE
whenever the