On 15/01/15 08:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.01.15 at 18:25, wrote:
>> I modify my code and here are some output examples:
>>
>> (XEN) Domain 1 (total: 768064):
>> (XEN) Node 0: 768064
>> (XEN) 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus, guest physical layout:
>> (XEN) 0: pnode 0 vcpus 0-9
>> (XEN
>>> On 14.01.15 at 18:25, wrote:
> I modify my code and here are some output examples:
>
> (XEN) Domain 1 (total: 768064):
> (XEN) Node 0: 768064
> (XEN) 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus, guest physical layout:
> (XEN) 0: pnode 0 vcpus 0-9
> (XEN) - 5dc00
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:49:17PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.01.15 at 12:45, wrote:
> > On 14/01/15 11:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 14.01.15 at 12:06, wrote:
> >>> May I suggest the following sylistic changes:
> >>>
> >>> 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus:
> >>> 1: pnode 0, vcpus {1-9}
> >>>
>>> On 14.01.15 at 13:02, wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:45:25AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 14/01/15 11:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.01.15 at 12:06, wrote:
>> >> May I suggest the following sylistic changes:
>> >>
>> >> 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus:
>> >> 1: pnode 0, vcpus {1-9}
>> >>
>>> On 14.01.15 at 12:45, wrote:
> On 14/01/15 11:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.01.15 at 12:06, wrote:
>>> May I suggest the following sylistic changes:
>>>
>>> 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus:
>>> 1: pnode 0, vcpus {1-9}
>>> - 5dc0
>>> 2: pnode 1, vcpus {10-20}
>>>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:45:25AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/01/15 11:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.01.15 at 12:06, wrote:
> >> May I suggest the following sylistic changes:
> >>
> >> 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus:
> >> 1: pnode 0, vcpus {1-9}
> >> - 5dc0
>
On 14/01/15 11:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.01.15 at 12:06, wrote:
>> May I suggest the following sylistic changes:
>>
>> 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus:
>> 1: pnode 0, vcpus {1-9}
>> - 5dc0
>> 2: pnode 1, vcpus {10-20}
>> 5dc0 - bb00
>>
>>> On 14.01.15 at 12:06, wrote:
> May I suggest the following sylistic changes:
>
> 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus:
> 1: pnode 0, vcpus {1-9}
> - 5dc0
> 2: pnode 1, vcpus {10-20}
> 5dc0 - bb00
> 0001 - 00010080
>
> Yo
On 13/01/15 20:51, Wei Liu wrote:
>
>>> +
>>> +vnuma = d->vnuma;
>>> +printk(" %u vnodes, %u vcpus:\n", vnuma->nr_vnodes,
>>> d->max_vcpus);
>>> +for ( i = 0; i < vnuma->nr_vnodes; i++ )
>>> +{
>>> +err = snprintf(keyhandler_scratch, 12, "%3u",
>>> +
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 07:21:47PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 13/01/15 12:11, Wei Liu wrote:
> > @@ -408,6 +413,49 @@ static void dump_numa(unsigned char key)
> >
> > for_each_online_node ( i )
> > printk("Node %u: %u\n", i, page_num_node[i]);
> > +
> > +if
On 13/01/15 12:11, Wei Liu wrote:
> @@ -408,6 +413,49 @@ static void dump_numa(unsigned char key)
>
> for_each_online_node ( i )
> printk("Node %u: %u\n", i, page_num_node[i]);
> +
> +if ( !d->vnuma )
> +continue;
Nit - extraneous whitespace.
>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:38:33PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 13.01.15 at 13:11, wrote:
> > @@ -408,6 +413,49 @@ static void dump_numa(unsigned char key)
> >
> > for_each_online_node ( i )
> > printk("Node %u: %u\n", i, page_num_node[i]);
> > +
> > +if (
>>> On 13.01.15 at 13:11, wrote:
> @@ -408,6 +413,49 @@ static void dump_numa(unsigned char key)
>
> for_each_online_node ( i )
> printk("Node %u: %u\n", i, page_num_node[i]);
> +
> +if ( !d->vnuma )
> +continue;
> +
> +vnuma = d->vnuma;
Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimsteva
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Cc: Jan Beulich
---
Changes in v3:
1. Constify struct vnuma_info.
2. Don't print amount of ram of a vmemrange.
3. Process softirqs when dumping information.
4. Fix format string.
Changes in v2:
1. Use unsigned int for loop vars.
2. Use strlc
14 matches
Mail list logo
