On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 08:28:44AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 04:16:32PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > From: Davidlohr Bueso
> >
> > With commit b92b8b35a2e ("locking/arch: Rename set_mb() to smp_store_mb()")
> > it was made clear that the context of this call
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 04:16:32PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> From: Davidlohr Bueso
>
> With commit b92b8b35a2e ("locking/arch: Rename set_mb() to smp_store_mb()")
> it was made clear that the context of this call (and thus set_mb)
> is strictly for CPU ordering, as opposed to IO. As such
From: Davidlohr Bueso
With commit b92b8b35a2e ("locking/arch: Rename set_mb() to smp_store_mb()")
it was made clear that the context of this call (and thus set_mb)
is strictly for CPU ordering, as opposed to IO. As such all archs
should use the smp variant of mb(), respecting the semantics and
sa
