On 2017/4/1 2:43, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On 03/31/2017 07:42 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Wei,
On 31/03/17 14:07, Wei Chen wrote:
If there is a pending SError while we're returning from trap. If the
SError handle option is "DIVERSE", we h
Hi Stefano,
On 03/31/2017 07:42 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Wei,
On 31/03/17 14:07, Wei Chen wrote:
If there is a pending SError while we're returning from trap. If the
SError handle option is "DIVERSE", we have to prevent slipping this
hypervisor
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> On 31/03/17 14:07, Wei Chen wrote:
> > If there is a pending SError while we're returning from trap. If the
> > SError handle option is "DIVERSE", we have to prevent slipping this
> > hypervisor SError to guest. So we have to use the dsb/isb t
Hi Wei,
On 31/03/17 14:07, Wei Chen wrote:
If there is a pending SError while we're returning from trap. If the
SError handle option is "DIVERSE", we have to prevent slipping this
hypervisor SError to guest. So we have to use the dsb/isb to guarantee
that the pending hypervisor SError would be c
If there is a pending SError while we're returning from trap. If the
SError handle option is "DIVERSE", we have to prevent slipping this
hypervisor SError to guest. So we have to use the dsb/isb to guarantee
that the pending hypervisor SError would be caught in hypervisor before
return to guest.
I
