On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:19:43AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.03.17 at 15:14, wrote:
> > @@ -1155,8 +1157,10 @@ static int __init construct_dom0_pv(
> > cpu = v->processor;
> > for ( i = 1; i < d->max_vcpus; i++ )
> > {
> > -cpu = cpumask_cycle(cpu, &dom0_cpus);
>
>>> On 20.03.17 at 15:14, wrote:
> @@ -1155,8 +1157,10 @@ static int __init construct_dom0_pv(
> cpu = v->processor;
> for ( i = 1; i < d->max_vcpus; i++ )
> {
> -cpu = cpumask_cycle(cpu, &dom0_cpus);
> -setup_dom0_vcpu(d, i, cpu);
> +struct vcpu *p = setup_d
On 20/03/17 14:14, Wei Liu wrote:
> We will later move dom0 builders to different directories. To avoid the
> need of making dom0_cpus visible outside dom0_builder.c, modify
> setup_dom0_vcpus to cycle through dom0_cpus internally instead of
> relying on the callers to do that.
>
> No functional ch
We will later move dom0 builders to different directories. To avoid the
need of making dom0_cpus visible outside dom0_builder.c, modify
setup_dom0_vcpus to cycle through dom0_cpus internally instead of
relying on the callers to do that.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
v3: new
--