On March 06, 2017 6:50 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:53:44AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>On March 03, 2017 10:36 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>>>+/*
>>>+ * Just like vcpu_kick(), nothing is needed for the following two cases:
>>>+ * 1. The target vCPU is not running, meani
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:53:44AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>On March 03, 2017 10:36 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>>+/*
>>+ * Just like vcpu_kick(), nothing is needed for the following two cases:
>>+ * 1. The target vCPU is not running, meaning it is blocked or runnable.
>>+ * 2. The t
On March 03, 2017 10:36 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>__vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt() wrongly used a softirq bit to decide
>whether to suppress an IPI. Its logic was: the first time an IPI was sent, we
>set
>the softirq bit. Next time, we would check that softirq bit before sending
>another IPI. If the 1s
__vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt() wrongly used a softirq bit to decide whether
to suppress an IPI. Its logic was: the first time an IPI was sent, we set
the softirq bit. Next time, we would check that softirq bit before sending
another IPI. If the 1st IPI arrived at the pCPU which was in
non-root mo
