On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:37:55AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/16 10:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >Hi Wei Liu, Julien,
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> >
> >this series is a bug fix. I think it should go in Xen 4.7, do you agree?
>
> Some changes in this series impact the emulation of PSCI
On 01/06/16 10:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Wei Liu, Julien,
Hi Stefano,
this series is a bug fix. I think it should go in Xen 4.7, do you agree?
Some changes in this series impact the emulation of PSCI for guest (see
target_affinity_mask in vpsci.c). Looking at the code again, they
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:29:56AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi Wei Liu, Julien,
>
> this series is a bug fix. I think it should go in Xen 4.7, do you agree?
>
Yes
Release-acked-by: Wei Liu
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2016, Wei Chen wrote:
> > bits are expanded to 64-bits. But Xen 64-bit ARM
Hi Wei Liu, Julien,
this series is a bug fix. I think it should go in Xen 4.7, do you agree?
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Wei Chen wrote:
> bits are expanded to 64-bits. But Xen 64-bit ARM code treats this it
> as 32-bit register.
> We have to provide correct accessing to this register to avoid
> unexpe
In ARM64 the MPIDR register is mapped to MPIDR_EL1, and the register
bits are expanded to 64-bits. But Xen 64-bit ARM code treats this it
as 32-bit register.
We have to provide correct accessing to this register to avoid
unexpected issues that is caused by incorrect MPIDR value.
Wei Chen (4):
xe
