On 22/02/16 13:24, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:18:38AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 22/02/16 09:42, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:03:17AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
Modern pvops linux kernels support an initrd not covered by the initial
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:18:38AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 22/02/16 09:42, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:03:17AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> Modern pvops linux kernels support an initrd not covered by the initial
> >> mapping. This capability is flagged by an
On 22/02/16 09:42, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:03:17AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Modern pvops linux kernels support an initrd not covered by the initial
>> mapping. This capability is flagged by an elf-note.
>>
>> In case the elf-note is set by the kernel don't place the
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:03:17AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Modern pvops linux kernels support an initrd not covered by the initial
> mapping. This capability is flagged by an elf-note.
>
> In case the elf-note is set by the kernel don't place the initrd into
> the initial mapping. This will
Modern pvops linux kernels support an initrd not covered by the initial
mapping. This capability is flagged by an elf-note.
In case the elf-note is set by the kernel don't place the initrd into
the initial mapping. This will allow to load larger initrds and/or
support domains with larger memory,
