On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:11:50PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 11/21/2014 05:17 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
The commit xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding. was using
the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
That is no good as we can dead-lock. As
On 11/21/2014 05:17 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
The commit xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding. was using
the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we swapped to using
the lock-less version and requiring that the
On 21/11/14 22:17, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
The commit xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding. was using
the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we swapped to using
the lock-less version and requiring that the
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:14:56PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 21/11/14 22:17, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
The commit xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding. was using
the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we
The commit xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding. was using
the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we swapped to using
the lock-less version and requiring that the callers
of 'pcistub_put_pci_dev' take the device lock.
