On May 23, 2016 9:41 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.05.16 at 10:08, wrote:
> > No spamming can occur.
>
> May I suggest "No spamming of the log can occur", to set some context for
> what follows?
>
Make sense.
> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iom
>>> On 18.05.16 at 10:08, wrote:
> No spamming can occur.
May I suggest "No spamming of the log can occur", to set some
context for what follows?
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> @@ -240,21 +240,49 @@ int iommu_map_page(struct domain *d, unsigned
Treat IOMMU mapping and unmapping failures as a fatal to the DomU
If IOMMU mapping and unmapping failed, crash the DomU and propagate
the error up to the call trees.
No spamming can occur. For DomU, we avoid logging any message
for already dying domains. For Dom0, that'll still be more verbose
tha
