On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 04:58:11PM +, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 19:44 +, Wei Liu wrote:
@@ -760,7 +760,8 @@ static int x86_shadow(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domid)
int arch_setup_meminit(struct xc_dom_image *dom)
{
int rc;
-xen_pfn_t pfn, allocsz,
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 19:44 +, Wei Liu wrote:
@@ -760,7 +760,8 @@ static int x86_shadow(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domid)
int arch_setup_meminit(struct xc_dom_image *dom)
{
int rc;
-xen_pfn_t pfn, allocsz, i, j, mfn;
+xen_pfn_t pfn, allocsz, mfn, total, pfn_base;
+
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 02:30:30PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 12/02/15 19:44, Wei Liu wrote:
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_private.h b/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
index 45b8644..1809674 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
#include
On 12/02/15 19:44, Wei Liu wrote:
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_private.h b/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
index 45b8644..1809674 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
#include xen/sys/privcmd.h
+#define XC_VNUMA_NO_NODE (~0U)
Shouldn't this
On 13/02/15 15:05, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 02:30:30PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 12/02/15 19:44, Wei Liu wrote:
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_private.h b/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
index 45b8644..1809674 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_private.h
@@
From libxc's point of view, it only needs to know vnode to pnode mapping
and size of each vnode to allocate memory accordingly. Add these fields
to xc_dom structure.
The caller might not pass in vNUMA information. In that case, a dummy
layout is generated for the convenience of libxc's allocation
