>>> On 26.10.16 at 11:12, wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 4:09 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
>> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
>> de...@li
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 4:09 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/7] V
>>> On 25.10.16 at 03:04, wrote:
> I really don't get the point why you think the list is not enough. Could
> you please explain more, thanks a lot!
I have to admit that I don't really know what else to say. Isn't it
quite obvious that for you to suppress the actual update, _all_
meaningful (in t
> From: Wu, Feng
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 9:05 AM
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 7:31 PM
> > To: Wu, Feng
> > Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
> > george.dun...@eu.citrix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 7:31 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/7] VT
>>> On 24.10.16 at 13:10, wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 6:57 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
>> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
>> de...@lis
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 6:57 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/7] VT
>>> On 24.10.16 at 12:18, wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 5:54 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
>> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
>> de...@lis
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 5:54 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/7] VT
>>> On 24.10.16 at 10:57, wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 3:28 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
>> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
>> de...@lis
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 3:28 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/7] VT
>>> On 17.10.16 at 09:02, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:56 PM
>> >>> On 11.10.16 at 02:57, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
>> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
>> > @@ -547,6 +547,49 @@ static in
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:56 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; dario.faggi...@citrix.com;
> george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin ; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7]
>>> On 11.10.16 at 02:57, wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c
> @@ -547,6 +547,49 @@ static int remap_entry_to_msi_msg(
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool_t pi_can_suppress_irte_update(struct iremap_entry *new,
bool (and true/
We don't set the affinity for posted format IRTE, since the
destination of these interrupts is vCPU and the vCPU affinity
is set during vCPU scheduling.
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu
---
v5:
- Only suppress affinity related IRTE updates for PI
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/intremap.c | 52 ++
15 matches
Mail list logo