This allows the caller to specify a uid and gid to use, even if there
is no corresponding password entry. This will be useful in certain
Xen configurations.
We don't support just -runas because: (i) deprivileging without
calling setgroups would be ineffective (ii) given only a uid we don't
know
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:38:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> +static bool os_parse_runas_uid_gid(const char *optarg)
> +{
> +unsigned long lv;
> +char *ep;
> +uid_t got_uid;
> +gid_t got_gid;
> +int rc;
> +
> +errno = 0;
> +lv = strtoul(optarg, &ep, 0); /* can't qemu_s
Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [PATCH v5.1 7/8] os-posix: Provide new -runas
: facility"):
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:38:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > +static bool os_parse_runas_uid_gid(const char *optarg)
...
> > +errno = 0;
> > +lv = strtoul(optarg, &ep, 0); /* can't qemu_strtoul, w
CC'ing the maintainers (scripts/get_maintainer.pl is your friend)
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This allows the caller to specify a uid and gid to use, even if there
> is no corresponding password entry. This will be useful in certain
> Xen configurations.
>
> We don't support just -
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH v5.1 7/8] os-posix: Provide new -runas
: facility"):
> CC'ing the maintainers (scripts/get_maintainer.pl is your friend)
I don't know what your scripts/get_maintainer.pl does, but mine
says:
get_maintainer.pl: No maintainers found, printing recent contrib
