On 9/23/2016 2:06 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Yu Zhang wrote:
Well, for the logic of p2m type recalculation, similarities between
p2m_ioreq_server
and other changeable types exceeds their differences. As to the special
cases, how
about we use a macro, i.e. p2m_is
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Yu Zhang wrote:
> Well, for the logic of p2m type recalculation, similarities between
> p2m_ioreq_server
> and other changeable types exceeds their differences. As to the special
> cases, how
> about we use a macro, i.e. p2m_is_ioreq?
On 9/9/2016 6:09 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 11:56, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 5:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 11:24, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 4:20 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 09:24, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 1:26 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
@@ -965,7 +
On 9/9/2016 6:09 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 11:56, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 5:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 11:24, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 4:20 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 09:24, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 1:26 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
@@ -965,7 +
>>> On 09.09.16 at 11:56, wrote:
>
> On 9/9/2016 5:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.09.16 at 11:24, wrote:
>>> On 9/9/2016 4:20 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 09.09.16 at 09:24, wrote:
> On 9/9/2016 1:26 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
> On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
>>> @@ -965,7
On 9/9/2016 5:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 11:24, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 4:20 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 09:24, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 1:26 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
@@ -965,7 +968,8 @@ static mfn_t ept_get_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
if (
>>> On 09.09.16 at 11:24, wrote:
>
> On 9/9/2016 4:20 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.09.16 at 09:24, wrote:
>>> On 9/9/2016 1:26 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
>>> On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
> @@ -965,7 +968,8 @@ static mfn_t ept_get_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
> if ( is_epte_va
On 9/9/2016 4:20 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.16 at 09:24, wrote:
On 9/9/2016 1:26 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
@@ -965,7 +968,8 @@ static mfn_t ept_get_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
if ( is_epte_valid(ept_entry) )
{
if ( (recalc || ept_entry->r
>>> On 09.09.16 at 09:24, wrote:
> On 9/9/2016 1:26 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
>> >>> On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
>> > @@ -965,7 +968,8 @@ static mfn_t ept_get_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
>> > if ( is_epte_valid(ept_entry) )
>> > {
>> > if ( (recalc || ept_entry->recalc) &&
>> > -
On 9/9/2016 1:26 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
>>> On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
> @@ -5551,7 +5553,35 @@ static int hvmop_map_mem_type_to_ioreq_server(
> if ( rc != 0 )
> goto out;
>
> -rc = hvm_map_mem_type_to_ioreq_server(d, op.id, op.type,
op.flags);
> +if ( gfn == 0 )
> +
>>> On 02.09.16 at 12:47, wrote:
> @@ -5551,7 +5553,35 @@ static int hvmop_map_mem_type_to_ioreq_server(
> if ( rc != 0 )
> goto out;
>
> -rc = hvm_map_mem_type_to_ioreq_server(d, op.id, op.type, op.flags);
> +if ( gfn == 0 )
> +rc = hvm_map_mem_type_to_ioreq_server
This patch resets p2m_ioreq_server entries back to p2m_ram_rw,
after an ioreq server has unmapped. The resync is done both
asynchronously with the current p2m_change_entry_type_global()
interface, and synchronously by iterating the p2m table. The
synchronous resetting is necessary because we need t
12 matches
Mail list logo
