enproject.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 01/12] x86/mm: allow a privileged PV
> domain to map guest mfns
>
> >>> On 27.09.17 at 16:22, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> >> Sent: 27 September 2017 1
>>> On 27.09.17 at 16:22, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: 27 September 2017 14:31
>> >>> On 27.09.17 at 14:49, wrote:
>> > Ok, I'll claim the final cmd value then.
>>
>> Final? We've got 5 left (for a total of 3
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 27 September 2017 14:31
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 01/12] x86/mm: allow a privileged PV
>>> On 27.09.17 at 14:49, wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: 27 September 2017 13:47
>> To: Paul Durrant
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen-
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 27 September 2017 13:47
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 01/12] x86/mm: allow a privileged PV
>>> On 27.09.17 at 13:18, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: 25 September 2017 14:03
>> >>> On 18.09.17 at 17:31, wrote:
>> > -if ( (real_pg_owner == NULL) || (pg_owner == l1e_owner) ||
>> > +if (
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 25 September 2017 14:03
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] x86/mm: allow a privileged PV
t; >> Beulich
> >> Sent: 25 September 2017 15:50
> >> To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com>
> >> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; xen-
> >> de...@lists.xenproject.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 01/12] x8
..@citrix.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; xen-
>> de...@lists.xenproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 01/12] x86/mm: allow a privileged PV
>> domain to map guest mfns
>>
>> >>> On 25.09.17 at 16:42, <paul.durr...@
enproject.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 01/12] x86/mm: allow a privileged PV
> domain to map guest mfns
>
> >>> On 25.09.17 at 16:42, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> >> Sent: 25 Septe
>>> On 25.09.17 at 16:42, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: 25 September 2017 14:03
>> >>> On 18.09.17 at 17:31, wrote:
>> The other aspect I don't understand is why this is needed for PV
>> Dom0, but not for PVH.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 25 September 2017 14:03
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] x86/mm: allow a privileged PV
>>> On 25.09.17 at 15:29, wrote:
> On 25/09/17 14:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.09.17 at 17:31, wrote:
>>> In the case where a PV domain is mapping guest resources then it needs make
>>> the HYPERVISOR_mmu_update call using DOMID_SELF,
On 25/09/17 14:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.09.17 at 17:31, wrote:
>> In the case where a PV domain is mapping guest resources then it needs make
>> the HYPERVISOR_mmu_update call using DOMID_SELF, rather than the guest
>> domid, so that the passed in gmfn values are
>>> On 18.09.17 at 17:31, wrote:
> In the case where a PV domain is mapping guest resources then it needs make
> the HYPERVISOR_mmu_update call using DOMID_SELF, rather than the guest
> domid, so that the passed in gmfn values are correctly treated as mfns
> rather than
>>> On 19.09.17 at 14:51, wrote:
> Ping?
Your patch series hasn't been forgotten, but I can't currently predict
when I would be able to look at it (together with the well over 100
other patches sitting in the queue). I can only promise: As soon as
other, often higher
Ping?
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Durrant [mailto:paul.durr...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 18 September 2017 16:31
> To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Paul Durrant ; Jan Beulich
> ; Andrew Cooper
> Subject:
In the case where a PV domain is mapping guest resources then it needs make
the HYPERVISOR_mmu_update call using DOMID_SELF, rather than the guest
domid, so that the passed in gmfn values are correctly treated as mfns
rather than gfns present in the guest p2m.
This patch removes a check which
18 matches
Mail list logo