On 04/10/17 11:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.09.17 at 17:38, wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Andrew Cooper
>>> Sent: 29 September 2017 16:35
>>> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
>>> Cc: Jan Beulich
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 04 October 2017 11:16
> To: Andrew Cooper ; Paul Durrant
>
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq
> servers rather than a list
>
> >>> On 29.
>>> On 29.09.17 at 17:38, wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Cooper
>> Sent: 29 September 2017 16:35
>> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
>> Cc: Jan Beulich
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq
>> servers rather than a list
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper
> Sent: 29 September 2017 16:35
> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Jan Beulich
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq
> servers rather than a list
>
> On 29/09/17 15:51, Paul Durrant wrote
On 29/09/17 15:51, Paul Durrant wrote:
> A subsequent patch will remove the current implicit limitation on creation
> of ioreq servers which is due to the allocation of gfns for the ioreq
> structures and buffered ioreq ring.
>
> It will therefore be necessary to introduce an explicit limit and, si
A subsequent patch will remove the current implicit limitation on creation
of ioreq servers which is due to the allocation of gfns for the ioreq
structures and buffered ioreq ring.
It will therefore be necessary to introduce an explicit limit and, since
this limit should be small, it simplifies th
