On 19/06/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.06.15 at 14:23, wrote:
>> On 19/06/15 11:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.06.15 at 11:52, wrote:
On 19/06/15 10:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.06.15 at 12:40, wrote:
>> On 18/06/15 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.06.1
>>> On 19.06.15 at 14:23, wrote:
> On 19/06/15 11:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.06.15 at 11:52, wrote:
>>> On 19/06/15 10:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 18.06.15 at 12:40, wrote:
> On 18/06/15 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.06.15 at 14:02, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/
On 19/06/15 11:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.06.15 at 11:52, wrote:
>> On 19/06/15 10:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.06.15 at 12:40, wrote:
On 18/06/15 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.06.15 at 14:02, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/ev
>>> On 19.06.15 at 11:52, wrote:
> On 19/06/15 10:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.06.15 at 12:40, wrote:
>>> On 18/06/15 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 17.06.15 at 14:02, wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
> +++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
> @@ -1175,22 +1175,6 @@ in
On 19/06/15 10:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.06.15 at 12:40, wrote:
>> On 18/06/15 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.06.15 at 14:02, wrote:
--- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
+++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
@@ -1175,22 +1175,6 @@ int alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel(
>>> On 18.06.15 at 12:40, wrote:
> On 18/06/15 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.06.15 at 14:02, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
>>> @@ -1175,22 +1175,6 @@ int alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel(
>>>
>>> void free_xen_event_channel(struct domai
>>> On 18.06.15 at 12:40, wrote:
> On 18/06/15 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.06.15 at 14:02, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
>>> @@ -1175,22 +1175,6 @@ int alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel(
>>>
>>> void free_xen_event_channel(struct domai
On 18/06/15 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.06.15 at 14:02, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
>> @@ -1175,22 +1175,6 @@ int alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel(
>>
>> void free_xen_event_channel(struct domain *d, int port)
>> {
>> -struct evtch
>>> On 17.06.15 at 14:02, wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
> +++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
> @@ -1175,22 +1175,6 @@ int alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel(
>
> void free_xen_event_channel(struct domain *d, int port)
> {
> -struct evtchn *chn;
> -
> -spin_lock(&d->event_lock);
notify_via_xen_event_channel() and free_xen_event_channel() had to
check if the domain was dying because they may be called while the
domain is being destroyed and the struct evtchn's are being freed.
By deferring the freeing of the struct evtchn's until all references
to the domain are dropped, t
10 matches
Mail list logo