David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com 04/29/15 12:54 PM
On 23/04/15 16:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/grant_table.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/grant_table.h
@@ -82,7 +82,12 @@ struct grant_table {
struct grant_mapping **maptrack;
unsigned int maptrack_head;
On 23/04/15 16:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/grant_table.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/grant_table.h
@@ -82,7 +82,12 @@ struct grant_table {
struct grant_mapping **maptrack;
unsigned int maptrack_head;
unsigned int maptrack_limit;
-/* Lock
On 22.04.15 at 18:00, david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
Subsequent changes make both these locks uncontented. Is this patch
really necessary? -- dvrabel
Yeah, particularly if this ...
@@ -540,6 +550,16 @@ static void mapcount(
*wrc = *rdc = 0;
+/*
+ * While taking the
From: Matt Wilson m...@amazon.com
The maptrack lock protects the maptrack state only.
Signed-off-by: Matt Wilson m...@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
---
Subsequent changes make both these locks uncontented. Is this patch
really necessary? -- dvrabel
---
