Am 14.05.2015 um 19:54 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> On 05/14/2015 10:07 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:04PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> * Create the FDC only if the option is "on".
> >>
> >> * Optional: make -drive if=floppy,... auto-enable it
> >
> > Ever
John Snow writes:
> On 05/14/2015 10:07 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:04PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Correct.
>>>
>>> Here's how I think it should be done:
>>>
>>> * Create a machine option to control the FDC
>>>
>>> This is a machine-specific option.
On 05/14/2015 10:07 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:04PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Correct.
>>
>> Here's how I think it should be done:
>>
>> * Create a machine option to control the FDC
>>
>> This is a machine-specific option. It should only exist for ma
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 14/05/2015 16:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 May 2015, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 14/05/2015 15:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >>> I tend to kindly disagree if you look at the broader perspective, yes
> >>> it's could
> >>> be a stor
On 14/05/2015 16:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2015, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 14/05/2015 15:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> I tend to kindly disagree if you look at the broader perspective, yes it's
>>> could
>>> be a storm in a tea cup, but there seems to be a pattern.
>>>
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 14/05/2015 15:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > I tend to kindly disagree if you look at the broader perspective, yes it's
> > could
> > be a storm in a tea cup, but there seems to be a pattern.
> >
> > From a "cmdline user" / "platform emulation" p
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:04PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Here's how I think it should be done:
>
> * Create a machine option to control the FDC
>
> This is a machine-specific option. It should only exist for machine
> types that have an optional FDC.
>
> Default
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 03:25:39PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>
> Thursday, May 14, 2015, 2:53:17 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 14/05/2015 14:45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Paolo Bonzini writes:
> >>
> >>> On 14/05/2015 14:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> It should certainly be of
On 14/05/2015 15:25, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> I tend to kindly disagree if you look at the broader perspective, yes it's
> could
> be a storm in a tea cup, but there seems to be a pattern.
>
> From a "cmdline user" / "platform emulation" point of view i can imagine that
> some sort of
> a
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 14/05/2015 13:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > I would be OK with a new property too, as we could set it from
>> > libxl or libvirt. Anybody would be happy to pick this one up or should I
>> > do it?
>>
>> Pls go ahead, I can merge it in the pc tree.
>
> Note that bec
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
> > On 14/05/2015 14:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> It should certainly be off for pc-q35-2.4 and newer. Real Q35 boards
> >> commonly don't have an FDC (depends on the Super I/O chip used).
> >>
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 03:25:39PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>
> Thursday, May 14, 2015, 2:53:17 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 14/05/2015 14:45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Paolo Bonzini writes:
> >>
> >>> On 14/05/2015 14:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> It should certainly be of
Thursday, May 14, 2015, 2:53:17 PM, you wrote:
> On 14/05/2015 14:45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>
>>> On 14/05/2015 14:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
It should certainly be off for pc-q35-2.4 and newer. Real Q35 boards
commonly don't have an FDC (depends
On 14/05/2015 14:45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
>> On 14/05/2015 14:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> It should certainly be off for pc-q35-2.4 and newer. Real Q35 boards
>>> commonly don't have an FDC (depends on the Super I/O chip used).
>>>
>>> We may want to ke
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 14/05/2015 14:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> It should certainly be off for pc-q35-2.4 and newer. Real Q35 boards
>> commonly don't have an FDC (depends on the Super I/O chip used).
>>
>> We may want to keep it off for pc-i440fx-2.4 and newer. I doubt
>> the
On 14/05/2015 14:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> It should certainly be off for pc-q35-2.4 and newer. Real Q35 boards
> commonly don't have an FDC (depends on the Super I/O chip used).
>
> We may want to keep it off for pc-i440fx-2.4 and newer. I doubt
> there's a real i440FX without an
"Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:12:52PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 May 2015, John Snow wrote:
>> > On 05/13/2015 02:15 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> > >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:29:46PM +0100
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 01:54:22PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 14/05/2015 13:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > I would be OK with a new property too, as we could set it from
> > > libxl or libvirt. Anybody would be happy to pick this one up or should I
> > > do it?
> >
> > Pls go ahead
On 14/05/2015 13:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I would be OK with a new property too, as we could set it from
> > libxl or libvirt. Anybody would be happy to pick this one up or should I
> > do it?
>
> Pls go ahead, I can merge it in the pc tree.
Note that because of the "-drive if=none,id=f
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:12:52PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> I would be OK with a new property too, as we could set it from
> libxl or libvirt. Anybody would be happy to pick this one up or should I
> do it?
Pls go ahead, I can merge it in the pc tree.
--
MST
__
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:18:26PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:12:52PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 May 2015, John Snow wrote:
> > > On 05/13/2015 02:15 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > >>
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:12:52PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, John Snow wrote:
> > On 05/13/2015 02:15 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:29:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >>> D
On Wed, 13 May 2015, John Snow wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 02:15 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:29:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> Do not emulate a floppy drive if no drives are supposed to be present.
> >>>
>
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:38:24AM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 13.05.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
> >On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:29:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>>Do not emulate a floppy drive if no drives are supposed to
Am 13.05.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:29:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Do not emulate a floppy drive if no drives are supposed to be present.
This fixes the behavior of -nodefaults, that should remov
On 05/13/2015 02:15 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:29:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Do not emulate a floppy drive if no drives are supposed to be present.
>>>
>>> This fixes the behavior of -nodefaults, that
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:29:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Do not emulate a floppy drive if no drives are supposed to be present.
> >
> > This fixes the behavior of -nodefaults, that should remove the floppy
> > drive (see docs/qdev-dev
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:29:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Do not emulate a floppy drive if no drives are supposed to be present.
>
> This fixes the behavior of -nodefaults, that should remove the floppy
> drive (see docs/qdev-device-use.txt:Default Devices), but actually
> doesn't.
Te
28 matches
Mail list logo
