On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On 03/03/2015 18:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
I would like to see a more generic handling of virq != physical irq.
This is not specific to LPIs but to any scenario where the physical irq
differs from the virtual irq.
I though we
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K vijaya.ku...@caviumnetworks.com
Add support for handling ITS(LPI) interrupts.
The LPI interrupts are handled by physical ITS
driver.
nested LPI interrupt handling is not tested and
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Vijaya
Hi Stefano,
On 03/03/2015 18:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
I would like to see a more generic handling of virq != physical irq.
This is not specific to LPIs but to any scenario where the physical irq
differs from the virtual irq.
I though we talked about it during the meeting at Connect...
From: Vijaya Kumar K vijaya.ku...@caviumnetworks.com
Add support for handling ITS(LPI) interrupts.
The LPI interrupts are handled by physical ITS
driver.
nested LPI interrupt handling is not tested and
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K vijaya.ku...@caviumnetworks.com
---
