From: Vijaya Kumar K
Add ITS support for arm. Following major features
are supported
- GICv3 ITS support for arm64 platform
- Supports multi ITS node
- LPI descriptors are allocated on-demand
- Only ITS Dom0 is supported
Tested with single ITS node.
Major changes in v2:
- Added Multi ITS s
Hi Vijay,
On 19/03/2015 14:37, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Add ITS support for arm. Following major features
are supported
- GICv3 ITS support for arm64 platform
- Supports multi ITS node
- LPI descriptors are allocated on-demand
- Only ITS Dom0 is supported
Tes
Hi Vijay,
On 19/03/2015 14:37, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Add ITS support for arm. Following major features
are supported
- GICv3 ITS support for arm64 platform
- Supports multi ITS node
- LPI descriptors are allocated on-demand
- Only ITS Dom0 is supported
Tes
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> On 19/03/2015 14:37, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Vijaya Kumar K
>>
>> Add ITS support for arm. Following major features
>> are supported
>> - GICv3 ITS support for arm64 platform
>> - Supports multi ITS node
>>
On 23/03/15 12:37, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Vijay,
>>
>> On 19/03/2015 14:37, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Vijaya Kumar K
>>>
>>> Add ITS support for arm. Following major features
>>> are supported
>>> - GICv3 ITS support fo
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/03/15 12:37, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Julien Grall
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Vijay,
>>>
>>> On 19/03/2015 14:37, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Add ITS support for arm. Fol
On 23/03/15 15:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>> The ITS still have to manage in someway the device. There is lots of
>> information that doesn't need to be created at every mapd (such as the
>> number of MSI).
>
> First assumption is VITS driver owns converting Virtual ITS commands
> to Physical ITS co
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/03/15 15:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>> The ITS still have to manage in someway the device. There is lots of
>>> information that doesn't need to be created at every mapd (such as the
>>> number of MSI).
>>
>> First assumption is VITS drive
On 23/03/15 16:09, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 23/03/15 15:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
The ITS still have to manage in someway the device. There is lots of
information that doesn't need to be created at every mapd (such as the
number
