Euan Harris writes (Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/29] libxl: Cancelling asynchronous
operations):
Yes, that would work, but an open loop approach like that can lead to
frustratingly unreliable tests. I think it would be best to make
the test aware of the state of the helper - or even in control of
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 06:19:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
On the contrary, I think many long-running operations, such as suspend
and migrations, involve multiple iterations of the libxl event loop.
Actual suspend/migrate is done in a helper process; the main process
is responsible for
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 04:10:35PM +, Euan Harris wrote:
We had a chat about testing these changes, and integrating them into xenopsd.
We agreed that we each had slightly different expectations of what we were
going to do, and when. I think we came to the following major
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 00/29] libxl: Cancelling
asynchronous operations):
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 20:09 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
This is v2 of my work-in-progress series to support cancellation of
long-running libxl operations.
[...]
I wouldn't recommend testing
Euan Harris writes (Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/29] libxl: Cancelling asynchronous
operations):
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 04:10:35PM +, Euan Harris wrote:
I think the most straightforward way to test the cancellation mechanism in
LibXL will be to adapt the way we test similar functionality in
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:08:04PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I wouldn't recommend testing it yet until I've at least smoke tested
it to see that things still work if you don't cancel them.
Would review of the series be useful and/or appreciated at this stage?
Perhaps the first half
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 20:09 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
This is v2 of my work-in-progress series to support cancellation of
long-running libxl operations.
[...]
I wouldn't recommend testing it yet until I've at least smoke tested
it to see that things still work if you don't cancel them.
Would
Euan Harris writes (Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/29] libxl: Cancelling asynchronous
operations):
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:09:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I have rebased this onto current staging. I have compiled it but
NOT EXECUTED IT AT ALL. Euan, I thought it would be useful to give
you
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:09:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I have rebased this onto current staging. I have compiled it but
NOT EXECUTED IT AT ALL. Euan, I thought it would be useful to give
you something you could start to work on building against.
I wouldn't recommend testing it
This is v2 of my work-in-progress series to support cancellation of
long-running libxl operations.
There are many improvements since v1, but the basic structure remains
the same and the external API remains unchanged.
I have rebased this onto current staging. I have compiled it but
NOT EXECUTED
Ian Jackson writes ([RFC PATCH v2 00/29] libxl: Cancelling asynchronous
operations):
This is v2 of my work-in-progress series to support cancellation of
long-running libxl operations.
There are many improvements since v1, but the basic structure remains
the same and the external API remains
11 matches
Mail list logo
