changes to V7:
* remove libxl_domain_snapshot_revert API
* about libxl_domain_snapshot_delete, disk snapshot part
could be extracted to libxlu if we would support many kinds of
disk backendtypes in future. Add words to the docs, but not
extended. Basic goal will support only raw and
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote:
>
> 3. Function Implementation
>
>libxl_domain_snapshot_create:
>1). check args validation
>2). save domain memory through save-domain
>3). take disk snapshot by qmp command (if domian is active) or qemu-img
>
>>> On 11/11/2014 at 01:04 AM, in message
, George
Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote:
>
> >
> > 3. Function Implementation
> >
> >libxl_domain_snapshot_create:
> >1). check args validation
> >2). save domain memory through save-domai
>>> On 11/11/2014 at 04:07 PM, in message
<5462343c026600078...@soto.provo.novell.com>, "Chun Yan Liu"
wrote:
>
On 11/11/2014 at 01:04 AM, in message
> , George
> Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 3. Function Implement
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 20:07 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> > > By "active" here, do you you mean "live" (vs paused)?
> > Means the domain is started (no matter is running or paused).
> > vs (libvirt defines a domain but not started).
> > Here, I should update this to:
> > 3). take disk snapshot
Hi, Ian,
According to previous discussion, snapshot delete and revert are
inclined to be done by high level application itself, won't supply a
libxl API. I'm wondering snapshot create need a new common API?
In fact its main work is save domain and take disk snapshot, xl can
do it too.
I just wri
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 02:08 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> Hi, Ian,
>
> According to previous discussion, snapshot delete and revert are
> inclined to be done by high level application itself, won't supply a
> libxl API.
I thought you had explained a scenario where the toolstack needed to be
at lea
>>> On 11/28/2014 at 11:43 PM, in message
>>> <1417189409.23604.62.ca...@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 02:08 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> > Hi, Ian,
> >
> > According to previous discussion, snapshot delete and revert are
> > inclined to be done by high level ap
>>> On 11/28/2014 at 11:43 PM, in message
>>> <1417189409.23604.62.ca...@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 02:08 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> > Hi, Ian,
> >
> > According to previous discussion, snapshot delete and revert are
> > inclined to be done by high level ap
On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 23:14 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
>
> >>> On 11/28/2014 at 11:43 PM, in message
> >>> <1417189409.23604.62.ca...@citrix.com>,
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 02:08 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> > > Hi, Ian,
> > >
> > > According to previous discussion, sn
I have to admit I'm confused by the back and forth discussion. It's hard
to justify the design of new API without knowing what the constraints
and requirements are from your PoV.
Here are my two cents, not about details, but about general constraints.
There are two layers, one is user of libxl (c
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 16:06 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> Regarding JSON API, as Ian said, feel free to hook it up to libxlu.
*If* it is useful to multiple toolstacks but not suitable for libxl then
libxlu would be the right place.
As I understood things the need for JSON here was xl specific, and it i
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:11:48PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 16:06 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Regarding JSON API, as Ian said, feel free to hook it up to libxlu.
>
> *If* it is useful to multiple toolstacks but not suitable for libxl then
> libxlu would be the right place.
>>> On 12/6/2014 at 12:06 AM, in message
<20141205160615.ga24...@zion.uk.xensource.com>, Wei Liu
wrote:
> I have to admit I'm confused by the back and forth discussion. It's hard
> to justify the design of new API without knowing what the constraints
> and requirements are from your PoV.
>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:34:47AM -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
>
>
> >>> On 12/6/2014 at 12:06 AM, in message
> <20141205160615.ga24...@zion.uk.xensource.com>, Wei Liu
> wrote:
> > I have to admit I'm confused by the back and forth discussion. It's hard
> > to justify the design of new API with
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:12:14AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:34:47AM -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> >
> >
> > >>> On 12/6/2014 at 12:06 AM, in message
> > <20141205160615.ga24...@zion.uk.xensource.com>, Wei Liu
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I have to admit I'm confused by the bac
>>> On 12/8/2014 at 07:12 PM, in message
<20141208111214.gc17...@zion.uk.xensource.com>, Wei Liu
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:34:47AM -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> >
> >
> > >>> On 12/6/2014 at 12:06 AM, in message
> > <20141205160615.ga24...@zion.uk.xensource.com>, Wei Liu
> >
>
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 22:04 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> Partly. At least for domain disk snapshot create/delete, I prefer using
> qmp commands instead of calling qemu-img one by one. Using qmp
> commands, libvirt will need libxl's help. Of course, if libxl doesn't
> supply that, libvirt can call q
>>> On 12/9/2014 at 07:11 PM, in message <1418123518.14361.20.ca...@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 22:04 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> > Partly. At least for domain disk snapshot create/delete, I prefer using
> > qmp commands instead of calling qemu-img one by one. Us
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:46 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
>
> >>> On 12/9/2014 at 07:11 PM, in message
> >>> <1418123518.14361.20.ca...@citrix.com>,
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 22:04 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> > > Partly. At least for domain disk snapshot create/delete, I pr
>>> On 12/13/2014 at 12:22 AM, in message
>>> <1418401323.16425.28.ca...@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:46 -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> >
> > >>> On 12/9/2014 at 07:11 PM, in message
> > >>> <1418123518.14361.20.ca...@citrix.com>,
> > Ian Campbell wrote:
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
