On 12/19/16 16:07 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 19/12/16 03:46, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
However, I am not sure of its purpose. Why cant you reuse the previous
host state area?
Intel SDM says SW should not access or modify the VXMON rgion of a
logical processor between vmxon and vmxoff. Though
On 19/12/16 03:46, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>> However, I am not sure of its purpose. Why cant you reuse the previous
>> host state area?
>>
>
> Intel SDM says SW should not access or modify the VXMON rgion of a
> logical processor between vmxon and vmxoff. Though I have tested on
> real hardware whe
On 12/16/16 20:59 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
Fault #GP(0) is expected in this test.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
---
tests/vvmx/vmxon.c | 29 +
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c b/tests/vvmx
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> Fault #GP(0) is expected in this test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
> ---
> tests/vvmx/vmxon.c | 29 +
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c b/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c
> index 0664a48..ec7ee7e 1
Fault #GP(0) is expected in this test.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
---
tests/vvmx/vmxon.c | 29 +
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c b/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c
index 0664a48..ec7ee7e 100644
--- a/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c
+++ b/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c
@
