On 10/08/16 12:01, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:11:27PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 08/08/16 14:13, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:06:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/08/16 12:24, Wei Liu
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:11:27PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 08/08/16 14:13, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:06:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > >> On 08/08/16 12:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> > >>> Now that xl create
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:11:27PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/08/16 14:13, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:06:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 08/08/16 12:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> >>> Now that xl create -c is fixed in xen-unstable, there is no need to keep
> >>> the hack
On 08/08/16 14:13, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:06:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/08/16 12:24, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> Now that xl create -c is fixed in xen-unstable, there is no need to keep
>>> the hack to get guest console output anymore.
>>>
>>> Use xl create -Fc directly,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:06:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/08/16 12:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Now that xl create -c is fixed in xen-unstable, there is no need to keep
> > the hack to get guest console output anymore.
> >
> > Use xl create -Fc directly, then wait for the xl process to
On 08/08/16 12:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> Now that xl create -c is fixed in xen-unstable, there is no need to keep
> the hack to get guest console output anymore.
>
> Use xl create -Fc directly, then wait for the xl process to exit. Print
> any error as it occurs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Now that xl create -c is fixed in xen-unstable, there is no need to keep
the hack to get guest console output anymore.
Use xl create -Fc directly, then wait for the xl process to exit. Print
any error as it occurs.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Rebased on top of master
---