On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:00:34PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Bringing in Konrad because...
>
> On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 11:37 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 07/06/17 20:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > > On 06/06/17 21:08, Stefano Stabellini
Bringing in Konrad because...
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 11:37 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/06/17 20:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > On 06/06/17 21:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 2) PV suspend/resume
> > > > 3) vector callback
> >
On 08/06/17 20:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 07/06/17 20:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 06/06/17 21:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 06/06/17 18
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/06/17 20:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 06/06/17 21:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 06/06/17 18:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 6
On 07/06/17 20:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 06/06/17 21:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 06/06/17 18:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 26/05/17 21
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 06/06/17 21:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 06/06/17 18:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 26/05/17 21:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 2
On 06/06/17 21:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 06/06/17 18:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 26/05/17 21:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 26/05/17 1
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 06/06/17 18:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 26/05/17 21:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 26/05/17 18:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Juergen Gross w
On 06/06/17 18:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 26/05/17 21:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 26/05/17 18:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Juergen Gross writes ("HVM guest performance regression"):
>> Lo
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 26/05/17 21:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 May 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 26/05/17 18:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >>> Juergen Gross writes ("HVM guest performance regression"):
> Looking for the reason of a performance regression
On 26/05/17 21:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 26/05/17 18:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Juergen Gross writes ("HVM guest performance regression"):
Looking for the reason of a performance regression of HVM guests under
Xen 4.7 against 4.5 I fou
>>> On 30.05.17 at 16:57, wrote:
> On 30/05/17 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 30.05.17 at 12:33, wrote:
>>> On 30/05/17 09:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
But if the OS allocated large pages internally for relevant data
structures, those obviously won't come from that necessarily 4k-
ma
On 30/05/17 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.05.17 at 12:33, wrote:
>> On 30/05/17 09:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.05.17 at 21:05, wrote:
Creating the domains with
xl -vvv create ...
showed the numbers of superpages and normal pages allocated for the
domai
>>> On 30.05.17 at 12:33, wrote:
> On 30/05/17 09:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.05.17 at 21:05, wrote:
>>> Creating the domains with
>>>
>>> xl -vvv create ...
>>>
>>> showed the numbers of superpages and normal pages allocated for the
>>> domain.
>>>
>>> The following allocation pattern res
On 30/05/17 09:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.17 at 21:05, wrote:
>> Creating the domains with
>>
>> xl -vvv create ...
>>
>> showed the numbers of superpages and normal pages allocated for the
>> domain.
>>
>> The following allocation pattern resulted in a slow domain:
>>
>> xc: detail: PHY
>>> On 29.05.17 at 21:05, wrote:
> Creating the domains with
>
> xl -vvv create ...
>
> showed the numbers of superpages and normal pages allocated for the
> domain.
>
> The following allocation pattern resulted in a slow domain:
>
> xc: detail: PHYSICAL MEMORY ALLOCATION:
> xc: detail: 4KB
On 26/05/17 21:01, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 26/05/17 18:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Juergen Gross writes ("HVM guest performance regression"):
Looking for the reason of a performance regression of HVM guests under
Xen 4.7 against 4.5 I fou
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 26/05/17 18:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Juergen Gross writes ("HVM guest performance regression"):
> >> Looking for the reason of a performance regression of HVM guests under
> >> Xen 4.7 against 4.5 I found the reason to be commit
> >> c26f92b8fce3c9df
On 26/05/17 18:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Juergen Gross writes ("HVM guest performance regression"):
>> Looking for the reason of a performance regression of HVM guests under
>> Xen 4.7 against 4.5 I found the reason to be commit
>> c26f92b8fce3c9df17f7ef035b54d97cbe931c7a ("libxl: remove freemem_sla
Juergen Gross writes ("HVM guest performance regression"):
> Looking for the reason of a performance regression of HVM guests under
> Xen 4.7 against 4.5 I found the reason to be commit
> c26f92b8fce3c9df17f7ef035b54d97cbe931c7a ("libxl: remove freemem_slack")
> in Xen 4.6.
>
> The problem occurre
20 matches
Mail list logo
