Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On 08/10/15 23:14, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:18 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >> [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks] >> >> TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit 1401c00e59e >> ("xen/gntdev: convert priv->lock to a mutex", which was added in

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On 12/10/15 13:56, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 11:11 +0100, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 08/10/15 23:14, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:18 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks] TL;DR: Any backport of

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 11:11 +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 08/10/15 23:14, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:18 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks] > > > > > > TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit 1401c00e59e >

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 10:27 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 10:30 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:55:00PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:51 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:10:46PM

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 10:30 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:55:00PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:51 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:10:46PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > ping for 3.10.y and 3.14.y > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:55:00PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:51 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:10:46PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > ping for 3.10.y and 3.14.y > > > > My stable queue is huge at the moment, and I've been on vacation

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

ping for 3.10.y and 3.14.y Thanks, Ian. On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:18 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks] > > TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit 1401c00e59e > ("xen/gntdev: convert priv->lock to a mutex", which was added in v4.0)

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:10:46PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > ping for 3.10.y and 3.14.y My stable queue is huge at the moment, and I've been on vacation and am now just finally catching up with it, don't worry, it's not lost, just might take a few weeks... thanks, greg k-h

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:51 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:10:46PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > ping for 3.10.y and 3.14.y > > My stable queue is huge at the moment, and I've been on vacation and am > now just finally catching up with it, don't worry, it's not

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:18:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks] > > TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit 1401c00e59e > ("xen/gntdev: convert priv->lock to a mutex", which was added in v4.0) > needs $something doing to it,

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On 03/09/15 12:05, Luis Henriques wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:18:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >> [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks] >> >> TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit 1401c00e59e >> ("xen/gntdev: convert priv->lock to a mutex", which was

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 12:16:39PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 03/09/15 12:05, Luis Henriques wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:18:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks] > >> > >> TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit 1401c00e59e ("xen/gntdev: convert priv->lock to a mutex", which was added in v4.0) needs $something doing to it, either s/mutex/spinlock/ or (more likely) backporting of 1401c00e59e too. Looking at LTS: 3.18.y: Backported both. 3.16.y:

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

[resending to correct stable address, sorry folks] TL;DR: Any backport of 30b03d05e074 to earlier than commit 1401c00e59e ("xen/gntdev: convert priv->lock to a mutex", which was added in v4.0) needs $something doing to it, either s/mutex/spinlock/ or (more likely) backporting of 1401c00e59e too.

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2"): > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 20:02 +, osstest service owner wrote: > > commit 9e6c072a69d87100808d16279d60e9f857291340 > > Author: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > > Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 10:57 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386 > -xl-qcow2"): > > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 20:02 +, osstest service owner wrote: > > > commit 9e6c072a69d87100808d16279d60e9f857291340 > > > Author: Marek

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:38 +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Hi, recently I tested qcow2 overlay on raw base as domUs disks (qcow2 > format in xl already specified) and I found that disk was always > corrupted (without nothing about in logs). > I tried with diffent versions of upstream qemu (2.2

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

Il 01/09/2015 11:19, Ian Campbell ha scritto: On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 20:02 +, osstest service owner wrote: branch xen-unstable xen branch xen-unstable job test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2 test guest-saverestore Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git Tree:

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 20:02 +, osstest service owner wrote: > branch xen-unstable > xen branch xen-unstable > job test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2 > test guest-saverestore > > Tree: linux > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git > Tree: linuxfirmware

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2

branch xen-unstable xen branch xen-unstable job test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2 test guest-saverestore Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: qemu