On 15.07.15 at 10:38, feng...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:25 PM
To: Wu, Feng
Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin;
Zhang, Yang Z; xen-devel@lists.xen.org;
On 15.07.15 at 10:55, feng...@intel.com wrote:
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:46 PM
On 15.07.15 at 10:38, feng...@intel.com wrote:
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:25 PM
On 15.07.15 at 08:04,
-Original Message-
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:25 PM
To: Wu, Feng
Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin;
Zhang, Yang Z; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; k...@xen.org
Subject: RE: [v3 10/15] vt-d: Add API
-Original Message-
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:46 PM
To: Wu, Feng
Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin;
Zhang, Yang Z; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; k...@xen.org
Subject: RE: [v3 10/15] vt-d: Add API
On 15.07.15 at 08:04, feng...@intel.com wrote:
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:02 PM
I'm particularly worried by the call to acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit()
- is it maybe worth storing the iommu pointer in struct msi_desc?
I think it worth, Like
-Original Message-
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:02 PM
To: Wu, Feng
Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com; george.dun...@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin;
Zhang, Yang Z; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; k...@xen.org
Subject: Re: [v3 10/15] vt-d: Add API to
On 24.06.15 at 07:18, feng...@intel.com wrote:
This patch adds an API which is used to update the IRTE
for posted-interrupt when guest changes MSI/MSI-X information.
This is again an example where adding a dead function complicates
review: How will I know here why this statement is correct,
From: Wu, Feng
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:18 PM
This patch adds an API which is used to update the IRTE
for posted-interrupt when guest changes MSI/MSI-X information.
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu feng...@intel.com
Acked-by: Kevin Tian kevin.t...@intel.com, with one small comment:
+int
-Original Message-
From: Tian, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 6:00 PM
To: Wu, Feng; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: k...@xen.org; jbeul...@suse.com; andrew.coop...@citrix.com; Zhang,
Yang Z; george.dun...@eu.citrix.com
Subject: RE: [v3 10/15] vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when
On 24/06/15 06:18, Feng Wu wrote:
This patch adds an API which is used to update the IRTE
for posted-interrupt when guest changes MSI/MSI-X information.
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu feng...@intel.com
---
v3:
- Remove adding PDA_MASK() when updating 'pda_l' and 'pda_h' for IRTE.
- Change the
This patch adds an API which is used to update the IRTE
for posted-interrupt when guest changes MSI/MSI-X information.
Signed-off-by: Feng Wu feng...@intel.com
---
v3:
- Remove adding PDA_MASK() when updating 'pda_l' and 'pda_h' for IRTE.
- Change the return type of pi_update_irte() to int.
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
