Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename "freeze" window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-09-02 Thread Lars Kurth
> On 2 Sep 2015, at 14:12, Stefano Stabellini > wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 02.09.15 at 13:50, wrote: >>> I would like to pick this up again. We are now getting close to RC3 and do >>> not seem to have

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename "freeze" window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-09-02 Thread Lars Kurth
Hi all, I would like to pick this up again. We are now getting close to RC3 and do not seem to have consensus. Would it make sense to summarise and just go for a vote? Lars > On 12 Aug 2015, at 08:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 06.08.15 at 12:52,

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename "freeze" window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-09-02 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 02.09.15 at 13:50, wrote: > I would like to pick this up again. We are now getting close to RC3 and do > not seem to have consensus. Would it make sense to summarise and just go for > a vote? Feel free to go ahead. Jan

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename "freeze" window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-09-02 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 02.09.15 at 13:50, wrote: > > I would like to pick this up again. We are now getting close to RC3 and do > > not seem to have consensus. Would it make sense to summarise and just go > > for > > a vote? > > Feel free to

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename freeze window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-08-12 Thread Jan Beulich
On 06.08.15 at 12:52, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote: I would even go as far as recommending maintainers to take patches in their personal trees while xen-unstable is frozen. Personally I already do that for QEMU. For small patches that might work. For large series perhaps repeatedly

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename freeze window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-08-12 Thread Jan Beulich
On 05.08.15 at 11:22, lars.kurth@gmail.com wrote: Release Process improvements: * Reopen the tree development tree as soon as possible after RC1 (I will let you guys figure out the best RC - let's call it RCx) * In other words, create the release branch at RCx Assuming this is what the

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename freeze window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-08-07 Thread Roger Pau Monné
El 05/08/15 a les 11.22, Lars Kurth ha escrit: This is one item of feedback, which I believe is a quick win for us. This is one piece of feedback from a list of items that have during the last few weeks been raised with me personally, either during face-2-face conversations in a private

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename freeze window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-08-06 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Lars Kurth wrote: This is one item of feedback, which I believe is a quick win for us. This is one piece of feedback from a list of items that have during the last few weeks been raised with me personally, either during face-2-face conversations in a private e-mail

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename freeze window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-08-06 Thread Wei Liu
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: This is one item of feedback, which I believe is a quick win for us. This is one piece of feedback from a list of items that have during the last few weeks been raised with me personally, either during face-2-face conversations in a

[Xen-devel] [xen 4.6 retrospective] [urgent] rename freeze window and make release branch as soon as possible after RC1

2015-08-05 Thread Lars Kurth
This is one item of feedback, which I believe is a quick win for us. This is one piece of feedback from a list of items that have during the last few weeks been raised with me personally, either during face-2-face conversations in a private e-mail thread. See