On 18.06.15 at 17:14, ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
Jan Beulich writes (4.5 qemu tree tagging):
could you please tag the respective qemu trees for 4.5.1? Considering
the little (if any at all) testing feedback we've been getting on stable
RCs, and considering how late we are with it, I
Jan Beulich writes (4.5 qemu tree tagging):
could you please tag the respective qemu trees for 4.5.1? Considering
the little (if any at all) testing feedback we've been getting on stable
RCs, and considering how late we are with it, I actually see no point in
doing another RC, so unless one of
Ian, Stefano,
could you please tag the respective qemu trees for 4.5.1? Considering
the little (if any at all) testing feedback we've been getting on stable
RCs, and considering how late we are with it, I actually see no point in
doing another RC, so unless one of you heavily objects I'd like the
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
Ian, Stefano,
could you please tag the respective qemu trees for 4.5.1? Considering
the little (if any at all) testing feedback we've been getting on stable
RCs, and considering how late we are with it, I actually see no point in
doing another RC, so
