On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
If win7 doesn't shutdown given a power button request I'd be more
inclined to remove the setting in osstest for those flights and let
guest-stop go back to being never pass than to start making such changes
to the VM config which I think
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:14 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 29/05/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
If win7 doesn't shutdown given a power button request I'd be more
inclined to remove
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
If win7 doesn't shutdown given a power button request I'd be more
inclined to remove the setting in osstest for those flights and let
guest-stop go back to being never pass than to
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:04 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
If win7 doesn't shutdown given a power button request I'd be more
inclined to remove the setting in osstest for those flights
On 29.05.15 at 15:14, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 29/05/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
If win7 doesn't shutdown given a power button request I'd be more
inclined to remove the
On 29/05/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
If win7 doesn't shutdown given a power button request I'd be more
inclined to remove the setting in osstest for those flights and let
guest-stop go
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 15:14, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 29/05/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
If win7 doesn't shutdown given a
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 15:31 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 29/05/15 15:00, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 15:14, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 29/05/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Durrant
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:07
To: Ian Campbell
Cc: Jan Beulich; Andrew Cooper; Ian Jackson; xen-devel
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7?
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com
-Original Message-
From: Ross Philipson [mailto:ross.philip...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:35
To: Ian Campbell; Paul Durrant
Cc: Andrew Cooper; xen-devel; Jan Beulich; Ian Jackson
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7?
On 05/29/2015 11:11 AM, Ian Campbell
On 05/29/2015 12:00 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Philipson [mailto:ross.philip...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:35
To: Ian Campbell; Paul Durrant
Cc: Andrew Cooper; xen-devel; Jan Beulich; Ian Jackson
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7
On 05/29/2015 11:11 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
FWIW We appear to wait 200s, if we were seeing failures due to windows
update then I'd be inclined to extend that, but I think right now that
would be premature, unless WU happens with no status
On 29.05.15 at 16:00, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 15:14, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 29/05/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100,
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
Sent: 29 May 2015 15:36
To: Paul Durrant
Cc: Jan Beulich; Andrew Cooper; Ian Jackson; xen-devel
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7?
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 15:25 +0100, Paul Durrant wrote
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
FWIW We appear to wait 200s, if we were seeing failures due to windows
update then I'd be inclined to extend that, but I think right now that
would be premature, unless WU happens with no status on the screen.
No, you'd see
-Original Message-
From: Paul Durrant
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:35
To: Ian Campbell
Cc: 'Jan Beulich'; Andrew Cooper; Ian Jackson; 'xen-devel'
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Durrant
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:07
On 29.05.15 at 17:34, paul.durr...@citrix.com wrote:
From: Paul Durrant
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:07
No, you'd see something. Perhaps our ACPI lid/power switch code is just
buggy then?
I already said this to Ian, but for the record... From my reading of the
ACPI spec (v 5.0, page 23 glossary
On 05/29/2015 12:00 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Philipson [mailto:ross.philip...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:35
To: Ian Campbell; Paul Durrant
Cc: Andrew Cooper; xen-devel; Jan Beulich; Ian Jackson
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7
On 05/29/15 10:49, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 15:40 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
I've mentioned it at least twice now but nobody seems to think it is of
note that even with the current settings it does the right thing about 1
time in 10? Is Win7 really expected to behave so
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
Sent: 29 May 2015 14:14
To: Jan Beulich
Cc: Andrew Cooper; Paul Durrant; Ian Jackson; xen-devel
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7?
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:04 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote
On 29/05/15 15:00, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 15:14, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 29/05/15 14:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 14:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 15:25 +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
Sent: 29 May 2015 14:14
To: Jan Beulich
Cc: Andrew Cooper; Paul Durrant; Ian Jackson; xen-devel
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable
In osstest self gate flight 56412 a change to make HVM guests
configurably use xl shutdown -F (-F == use ACPI fallback if PV drivers
absent) and apply the option to the win7 and winxpsp3 tests went into
production.
On winxpsp3 this appears to have been a success and things are working
pretty well
On 22.05.15 at 10:54, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
May 22 01:28:33.149028 (XEN) VCPU information and callbacks for
domain 18:
May 22 01:28:33.156972 (XEN) VCPU0: CPU2 [has=F] poll=0
upcall_pend=00 upcall_mask=00 dirty_cpus={2}
May 22 01:28:33.165038 (XEN)
On 22/05/15 09:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
In osstest self gate flight 56412 a change to make HVM guests
configurably use xl shutdown -F (-F == use ACPI fallback if PV drivers
absent) and apply the option to the win7 and winxpsp3 tests went into
production.
On winxpsp3 this appears to have been
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 09:59 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 22/05/15 09:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
In osstest self gate flight 56412 a change to make HVM guests
configurably use xl shutdown -F (-F == use ACPI fallback if PV drivers
absent) and apply the option to the win7 and winxpsp3 tests
26 matches
Mail list logo
