Re: [Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 20.01.16 at 19:32, wrote: > On 18/01/16 15:53, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Looking at the XenServer patch queue, I have a few nominations for >> backports. >> >> Hypervisor: >> 22a1fbb575df "x86/hvm: make sure stdvga cache cannot be re-enabled" > > This patch appears to have been missed in the

Re: [Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

2016-01-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 18/01/16 15:53, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Hi, > > Looking at the XenServer patch queue, I have a few nominations for > backports. > > Hypervisor: > 22a1fbb575df "x86/hvm: make sure stdvga cache cannot be re-enabled" This patch appears to have been missed in the latest round of backports. It cause

Re: [Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

2016-01-20 Thread Doug Goldstein
On 1/20/16 7:14 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 20/01/16 12:29, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.01.16 at 16:53, wrote: >>> Possibly also: >>> 42940c046902 "x86/shadow: Fix missing newline in dprintk()" >> The affected statement compiles to nothing in a release build, which >> can be taken as an argum

Re: [Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

2016-01-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 20/01/16 12:29, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.01.16 at 16:53, wrote: >> Possibly also: >> 42940c046902 "x86/shadow: Fix missing newline in dprintk()" > The affected statement compiles to nothing in a release build, which > can be taken as an argument both ways. I lean towards not putting > it i

Re: [Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.01.16 at 16:53, wrote: > Possibly also: > 42940c046902 "x86/shadow: Fix missing newline in dprintk()" The affected statement compiles to nothing in a release build, which can be taken as an argument both ways. I lean towards not putting it in. > 6851e979874e "VT-d: use proper error cod

Re: [Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

2016-01-19 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 19/01/16 13:43, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Backports for Xen 4.6"): >> Toolstack: >> 82ff7cbed64e "oxenstored: Quota.merge: don't assume domain already exists" >> 8a2c11f876e6 "tools/ocaml/xb: Correct calculations of data/space the ring" > I have applied these to 4.6 and 4.5. T

Re: [Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

2016-01-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Andrew Cooper writes ("Backports for Xen 4.6"): > Toolstack: > 82ff7cbed64e "oxenstored: Quota.merge: don't assume domain already exists" > 8a2c11f876e6 "tools/ocaml/xb: Correct calculations of data/space the ring" I have applied these to 4.6 and 4.5. They didn't apply cleanly to 4.4. If someone

[Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

2016-01-18 Thread Andrew Cooper
Hi, Looking at the XenServer patch queue, I have a few nominations for backports. Hypervisor: 22a1fbb575df "x86/hvm: make sure stdvga cache cannot be re-enabled" 0747bc8b4d85 "x86/vmx: Fix injection of #DB traps following XSA-156" Possibly also: 42940c046902 "x86/shadow: Fix missing newline in d