On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:25:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 22.09.17 at 00:46, wrote:
>> > One piece that I see still missing is the Xen command line parameters
>> > not being verified. It would be ideal to have the option to get t
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:25:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.09.17 at 00:46, wrote:
> > One piece that I see still missing is the Xen command line parameters
> > not being verified. It would be ideal to have the option to get that
> > set during compile time as well, similar to Linux's
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.09.17 at 00:46, wrote:
>> One piece that I see still missing is the Xen command line parameters
>> not being verified. It would be ideal to have the option to get that
>> set during compile time as well, similar to Linux's CONFIG_CMDL
>>> On 22.09.17 at 00:46, wrote:
> One piece that I see still missing is the Xen command line parameters
> not being verified. It would be ideal to have the option to get that
> set during compile time as well, similar to Linux's CONFIG_CMDLINE
> option, to avoid for example getting iommu or XSM b
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:59:51AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.09.17 at 17:20, wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> On 20.09.17 a
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:59:51AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.09.17 at 17:20, wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> On 20.09.17 a
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:59:51AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.09.17 at 17:20, wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 20.09.17 at 00:23, wrote:
> Yeap, the shim pretty simply removed
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.09.17 at 17:20, wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.09.17 at 00:23, wrote:
Yeap, the shim pretty simply removed the .reloc section as it was
marked discardable and did the relocation
>>> On 20.09.17 at 17:20, wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.09.17 at 00:23, wrote:
>>> Yeap, the shim pretty simply removed the .reloc section as it was
>>> marked discardable and did the relocations for Xen. So with that
>>> removed from the shim I no lon
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.09.17 at 00:23, wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.09.17 at 18:20, wrote:
Of course, you can grab them from here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5duyI9SzNtWaXE0cjM1QzZJbVk
>>> On 20.09.17 at 00:23, wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.09.17 at 18:20, wrote:
>>> Of course, you can grab them from here:
>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5duyI9SzNtWaXE0cjM1QzZJbVk?usp=shar
>>>
>>> ing
>>
>> So the dumps of the two (usin
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.09.17 at 18:20, wrote:
>> Of course, you can grab them from here:
>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5duyI9SzNtWaXE0cjM1QzZJbVk?usp=shar
>> ing
>
> So the dumps of the two (using my own tool) are identical except for
> the ex
>>> On 13.09.17 at 11:21, wrote:
On 13.09.17 at 07:27, wrote:
>> CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
>> 6 .bss 00143280 82d08082 82d08082 2**4
>> ALLOC, RELOC
>
> Objdump is apparently ignoring a section attribute bit here - m
>>> On 14.09.17 at 18:20, wrote:
> Of course, you can grab them from here:
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5duyI9SzNtWaXE0cjM1QzZJbVk?usp=shar
> ing
So the dumps of the two (using my own tool) are identical except for
the expected difference due to the certificate. In particular neith
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.09.17 at 17:43, wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.09.17 at 16:40, wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.09.17 at 07:27, wrote:
>>Sections:
>>>
>>> On 14.09.17 at 17:43, wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.09.17 at 16:40, wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 13.09.17 at 07:27, wrote:
>Sections:
>Idx Name Size VMA LMA
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.09.17 at 16:40, wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.09.17 at 07:27, wrote:
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off
Algn
0 .text
>>> On 13.09.17 at 16:40, wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.09.17 at 07:27, wrote:
>>>Sections:
>>>Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off
>>>Algn
>>> 0 .text 0017a1ba 82d08020 82d08020 1000
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.09.17 at 07:27, wrote:
>>Sections:
>>Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
>> 0 .text 0017a1ba 82d08020 82d08020 1000
>> 2**12
>> CONTENTS, AL
>>> On 13.09.17 at 07:27, wrote:
>Sections:
>Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
> 0 .text 0017a1ba 82d08020 82d08020 1000 2**12
> CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, CODE
> 1 .rodata 000826a0 82d08040
>>> On 13.09.17 at 01:40, wrote:
> for the last couple weeks I've been poking around the options
> available to get Xen booted on a Secureboot enabled box. My goal is to
> extend the chain of trust to the dom0 kernel. According to
> https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_EFI this is something that's
Hi Tamas,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 05:40:35PM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Hi all,
> for the last couple weeks I've been poking around the options
> available to get Xen booted on a Secureboot enabled box. My goal is to
> extend the chain of trust to the dom0 kernel. According to
> https://wiki.
Hi all,
for the last couple weeks I've been poking around the options
available to get Xen booted on a Secureboot enabled box. My goal is to
extend the chain of trust to the dom0 kernel. According to
https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_EFI this is something that's
supposed to be supported out-of-t
23 matches
Mail list logo
