Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

> On 10 Jun 2015, at 10:51, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 10/06/15 10:42, Lars Kurth wrote: >> Alright, >> if nobody is willing to come up with a definition of >> experimental/preview/supported/deprecated, I will based on what I have seen >> Lars > > I was planning to start a document to this ef

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

> On 10 Jun 2015, at 10:51, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 10/06/15 10:42, Lars Kurth wrote: >> Alright, >> if nobody is willing to come up with a definition of >> experimental/preview/supported/deprecated, I will based on what I have seen >> Lars > > I was planning to start a document to this ef

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

>>> On 10.06.15 at 11:42, wrote: > if nobody is willing to come up with a definition of > experimental/preview/supported/deprecated, I will based on what I have seen I didn't think we severely disagreed on these states' meanings; my understanding was more that we need to clarify that ./MAINTAINE

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

On 10/06/15 10:42, Lars Kurth wrote: > Alright, > if nobody is willing to come up with a definition of > experimental/preview/supported/deprecated, I will based on what I have seen > Lars I was planning to start a document to this effect to live in docs/features/, given the success of the command

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

Alright, if nobody is willing to come up with a definition of experimental/preview/supported/deprecated, I will based on what I have seen Lars > On 9 Jun 2015, at 10:53, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.06.15 at 22:59, wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 14:01 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: On 8 Jun

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

>>> On 08.06.15 at 22:59, wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 14:01 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >> > On 8 Jun 2015, at 13:19, Ian Campbell wrote: >> > >> > In MAINTAINERS S: Supported means: >> > >> > "Someone is actually paid to look after this.", which I think is >> > distinct from "This works well e

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 14:01 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 8 Jun 2015, at 13:19, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > In MAINTAINERS S: Supported means: > > > > "Someone is actually paid to look after this.", which I think is > > distinct from "This works well enough that the project is happy to > > rec

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

> On 8 Jun 2015, at 13:19, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 13:00 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.06.15 at 12:43, wrote: >>> b) Do we actually have or should have a definition of >>> experimental/preview/supported/deprecated. I don't think this was ever >>> written down an

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 13:00 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 08.06.15 at 12:43, wrote: > > b) Do we actually have or should have a definition of > > experimental/preview/supported/deprecated. I don't think this was ever > > written down and was defined before I joined. Also, there are no real

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

>>> On 08.06.15 at 12:43, wrote: > b) Do we actually have or should have a definition of > experimental/preview/supported/deprecated. I don't think this was ever > written down and was defined before I joined. Also, there are no real > conventions related to changing the state. > > c) How doe

[Xen-devel] Clarifying the state of ARINC653 scheduler (and other components) in Xen 4.5 and beyond

Hi, I wanted to point out that there is some discrepancy on the supported state of the ARINC653 scheduler * http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features not listed at all * http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_