On 11/04/17 10:24, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On 04/11/2017 12:01 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
On 10/04/17 00:12, André Przywara wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to run some ideas on how to prevent the race conditions we are
facing with the ITS
Hi Stefano,
On 04/11/2017 12:01 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
On 10/04/17 00:12, André Przywara wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to run some ideas on how to prevent the race conditions we are
facing with the ITS emulation and removing devices and/or LPIs.
I
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/04/17 00:12, André Przywara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to run some ideas on how to prevent the race conditions we are
> > facing with the ITS emulation and removing devices and/or LPIs.
> > I think Stefano's idea of tagging a
Hi,
On 10/04/17 00:12, André Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to run some ideas on how to prevent the race conditions we are
> facing with the ITS emulation and removing devices and/or LPIs.
> I think Stefano's idea of tagging a discarded LPI is the key, but still
> some details are left to be
Hi,
I wanted to run some ideas on how to prevent the race conditions we are
facing with the ITS emulation and removing devices and/or LPIs.
I think Stefano's idea of tagging a discarded LPI is the key, but still
some details are left to be solved.
I think we are dealing with two issues:
1) A
Hi,
I wanted to run some ideas on how to prevent the race conditions we are
facing with the ITS emulation and removing devices and/or LPIs.
I think Stefano's idea of tagging a discarded LPI is the key, but still
some details are left to be solved.
I think we are dealing with two issues:
1) A
