Re: [Xen-devel] On setting clear criteria for declaring a feature acceptable (was "vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling")

2016-03-10 Thread George Dunlap
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:02 PM, David Vrabel wrote: > On 09/03/16 16:23, George Dunlap wrote: >> >> I don't know why this is controversial -- this seems obvious to me. >> What do other committers / maintainers think? > > I started on a reply to this but then I went back and read the original > thr

Re: [Xen-devel] On setting clear criteria for declaring a feature acceptable (was "vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling")

2016-03-09 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 12:23 AM > > [Changing the subject and CC'ing more people] > > On 09/03/16 13:39, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.03.16 at 19:38, wrote: > >> If I may go "meta" for a moment here -- this is exactly what I'm

Re: [Xen-devel] On setting clear criteria for declaring a feature acceptable (was "vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling")

2016-03-09 Thread Wu, Feng
> -Original Message- > From: David Vrabel [mailto:david.vra...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 2:02 AM > To: George Dunlap ; Jan Beulich > > Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Dario Faggioli > ; George Dunlap ; > Wu, Feng ; Tian, Kevin ; xen- > de...@lists.xen.org; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ;

Re: [Xen-devel] On setting clear criteria for declaring a feature acceptable (was "vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling")

2016-03-09 Thread David Vrabel
On 09/03/16 16:23, George Dunlap wrote: > > I don't know why this is controversial -- this seems obvious to me. > What do other committers / maintainers think? I started on a reply to this but then I went back and read the original thread... +/* + * XXX: The length of the list depends on

[Xen-devel] On setting clear criteria for declaring a feature acceptable (was "vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling")

2016-03-09 Thread George Dunlap
[Changing the subject and CC'ing more people] On 09/03/16 13:39, Jan Beulich wrote: On 08.03.16 at 19:38, wrote: >> If I may go "meta" for a moment here -- this is exactly what I'm talking >> about with "Something bad may happen" being difficult to work with. >> Rather than you spelling out