Re: [Xen-devel] PVHv2 vs HVMlite

2016-09-27 Thread Juergen Gross
On 27/09/16 16:19, David Vrabel wrote: > On 27/09/16 15:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> I will be dusting off Linux domU PVHv2 patches now that ACPI changes are >> getting close to being accepted. >> >> Last version of that patch referred to these guests as 'hvmlite', >> including in names of variabl

Re: [Xen-devel] PVHv2 vs HVMlite

2016-09-27 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 03:19:32PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 27/09/16 15:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > I will be dusting off Linux domU PVHv2 patches now that ACPI changes are > > getting close to being accepted. > > > > Last version of that patch referred to these guests as 'hvmlite', > >

Re: [Xen-devel] PVHv2 vs HVMlite

2016-09-27 Thread David Vrabel
On 27/09/16 15:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > I will be dusting off Linux domU PVHv2 patches now that ACPI changes are > getting close to being accepted. > > Last version of that patch referred to these guests as 'hvmlite', > including in names of variables, routines etc. I was hesitant to remove >

[Xen-devel] PVHv2 vs HVMlite

2016-09-27 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
I will be dusting off Linux domU PVHv2 patches now that ACPI changes are getting close to being accepted. Last version of that patch referred to these guests as 'hvmlite', including in names of variables, routines etc. I was hesitant to remove "classic" PVH code and use "pvh" instead of "hvmlite"