[Xen-devel] Pygrub backports

2015-02-27 Thread Ian Jackson
I think the following commits from master should be considered for backport: 0c12e5b7427b4dfd2dfabf21f6b0e6e24bc8e864 tools/pygrub: Fix extlinux when /boot is a separate partition from / d1b93ea2615bd789ee28901f1f1c05ffb319cb61 tools/pygrub: Make pygrub understand default entry in string format

Re: [Xen-devel] Pygrub backports

2015-02-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 12:29 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > I think the following commits from master should be considered for > backport: > > 0c12e5b7427b4dfd2dfabf21f6b0e6e24bc8e864 > tools/pygrub: Fix extlinux when /boot is a separate partition from / > > d1b93ea2615bd789ee28901f1f1c05ffb319cb61 >

Re: [Xen-devel] Pygrub backports

2015-02-27 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 27.02.15 at 13:29, wrote: > I think the following commits from master should be considered for > backport: Looks reasonable. Question is - do you still want this for 4.4.2 or only afterwards? If for it, then can these please go in before RC2 (which really is only pending a push on the bran

Re: [Xen-devel] Pygrub backports

2015-02-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: Pygrub backports"): > >>> On 27.02.15 at 13:29, wrote: > > I think the following commits from master should be considered for > > backport: > > Looks reasonable. Question is - do you still want this for 4.4.2 or > only afterwards? If for it, then can these please go in be

Re: [Xen-devel] Pygrub backports

2015-02-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: Pygrub backports"): > Sounds good. If we could also get an example of the problematic grub.cfg > to be checked into xen.git/tools/pygrub/examples that would be handy > too. I have asked the reporter for a (suitably-laundered) copy and some info about how it was generated.

Re: [Xen-devel] Pygrub backports

2015-02-27 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 27.02.15 at 15:41, wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: Pygrub backports"): >> >>> On 27.02.15 at 13:29, wrote: >> > I think the following commits from master should be considered for >> > backport: >> >> Looks reasonable. Question is - do you still want this for 4.4.2 or >> only afterwards?

Re: [Xen-devel] Pygrub backports

2015-02-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: Pygrub backports"): > On 27.02.15 at 15:41, wrote: > > So if you don't mind too much, can we have them in 4.4.2 ? In which > > case I would push them right away. > > Sure, go ahead. Thanks. They were already in 4.5. I have backported them all to 4.3 and 4.4. There wa