>>> Ian Jackson 04/14/16 8:12 PM >>>
>Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] REST MAINTAINERS feedback requested Was:
>> And btw., considering that Konrad has already posted a revert patch,
>> and I have ack-ed that one, this could now go in right away (and the
>> discussion could either be settled
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 07:11:46PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] REST MAINTAINERS feedback requested
> Was:Re: [PATCH v5 01/28] HYPERCALL_version_op. New hypercall mirroring
> XENVER_ but sane."):
> > On the other hand, I think there's a bit of a faulty interp
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] REST MAINTAINERS feedback requested
Was:Re: [PATCH v5 01/28] HYPERCALL_version_op. New hypercall mirroring XENVER_
but sane."):
> On the other hand, I think there's a bit of a faulty interpretation of
> the procedure here. Jan reviewed the patch thoroughly
