Resend: Sorry copy and pasted a wrong mailadress for the xen-devel list.
Hi Boris / Juergen,
This morning i got this dom0 kernel crash (it occurred sporadically
before (during 4.11), but i didn't have serial console enabled at that
time so i had no stacktrace, only sporadic reboots).
It's runni
On 04/24/2017 06:06 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Resend: Sorry copy and pasted a wrong mailadress for the xen-devel list.
>
>
> Hi Boris / Juergen,
>
> This morning i got this dom0 kernel crash (it occurred sporadically
> before (during 4.11), but i didn't have serial console enabled at that
> t
Hi Boris,
Nope, not that i am aware of.
--
Sander
On 24/04/17 16:17, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 06:06 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Resend: Sorry copy and pasted a wrong mailadress for the xen-devel list.
>>
>>
>> Hi Boris / Juergen,
>>
>> This morning i got this dom0 kernel crash
On 04/24/2017 10:20 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Nope, not that i am aware of.
If you can keep console while running this, can you add these changes
and see if we ever unbind the work vector (you can even add dump_stack()
in __unbind_from_irq() for good measure)? (I added HHH for
On 24/04/17 17:49, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 10:20 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> Nope, not that i am aware of.
>
> If you can keep console while running this, can you add these changes
> and see if we ever unbind the work vector (you can even add dump_stack()
> in _
On 04/24/2017 12:10 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 24/04/17 17:49, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 04/24/2017 10:20 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi Boris,
>>>
>>> Nope, not that i am aware of.
>> If you can keep console while running this, can you add these changes
>> and see if we ever unbin
On 24/04/17 22:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 12:10 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 24/04/17 17:49, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 04/24/2017 10:20 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi Boris,
Nope, not that i am aware of.
>>> If you can keep console while running this, can
On 25/04/17 08:14, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/04/17 22:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 04/24/2017 12:10 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 24/04/17 17:49, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 04/24/2017 10:20 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Nope, not that i am aware of.
>>>
On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:14, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 24/04/17 22:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 04/24/2017 12:10 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 24/04/17 17:49, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 10:20 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Hi
On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:14, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 24/04/17 22:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 04/24/2017 12:10 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 24/04/17 17:49, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 04/24/2017
On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> (XEN) [2017-04-24 21:20:53.203] d0v0 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap
>>> [#6, ec=]
>>> (XEN) [2017-04-24 21:20:53.203] domain_crash_sync called fro
On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
(XEN) [2017-04-24 21:20:53.203] d0v0 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap
[#6, ec=]
(XEN) [2017-0
On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> (XEN) [2017-04-24 21:20:53.203] d0v0 Unhandled invalid opcode fa
On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> (XEN) [2017-04-24 21:20:53.203] d0v0 Unhandled invalid opcode fa
On 25/04/17 13:00, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> (XEN) [2017-04-24
On 25/04/17 13:28, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 13:00, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:35
On 25/04/17 13:38, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 13:28, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 13:00, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:42
On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> (XEN) [2017-04-24 21:20:53.203] d0v0 Unhandled invalid opcode fa
On 25/04/17 14:49, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:35, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> (XEN) [2017-04-24
On 25/04/17 15:12, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 14:49, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:35
On 25/04/17 16:07, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 15:12, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 14:49, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 25/04/17 12:33, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 25/04/17 09:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/17 08:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 08:42
21 matches
Mail list logo
